I got this question once again today in a previous post.
What’s wrong by using Toad against a database?
The worst case scenario:
- some non-technical staff is clicking around in your production database with read-write access
The best-case scenario :
- nobody has access to your database
Here is a short list on how you could protect your data :
- Give the right privilege to the right person. DBA role to the DBA, CREATE TABLE/CREATE INDEX to the developer, INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE to the application
- Restrict access to your database server. Use some firewall. Allow only the dba workstation and the application server to the Production environment
What if the end-user PC needs access to the Production database with a powerfull user? This often happend in real world. A fat client is installed on the PC, the password is somehow hardcoded, the privileges granted to the hardcoded user are uterly generous…
It is not a bad practice in this case to block access to the database server to Toad/SQLPLUS and thelike. This will very ineffeciently prevent some garage-hacker from corrupting your database, but it will prevent your sales / marketing colleagues from deleting data, locking tables and degrading performance. This could be done by some login triggers or, my preference, some administrative measures like information, auditting and sanctions.