<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MIN(DISTINCT X)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html</link>
	<description>Oracle Certified Master</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Laurent Schneider</title>
		<link>http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html#comment-5171</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurent Schneider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html#comment-5171</guid>
		<description>of course Gary, thanks for making this clear, my point was using DISTINCT to achieve a better performance when ALL and DISTINCT are equivalent, as for min, MIN(ALL X) is always the same as MIN(DISTINCT X)

You may then wonder why MIN and MAX accept DISTINCT but MEDIAN does not...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course Gary, thanks for making this clear, my point was using DISTINCT to achieve a better performance when ALL and DISTINCT are equivalent, as for min, MIN(ALL X) is always the same as MIN(DISTINCT X)</p>
<p>You may then wonder why MIN and MAX accept DISTINCT but MEDIAN does not&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html#comment-5156</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 22:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laurentschneider.com/wordpress/2007/10/mindistinct-x.html#comment-5156</guid>
		<description>Whether it is appropriate to your aggregation function is a different matter.
MIN is unaffected, but AVG(DISTINCT col) and AVG(col) would return different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it is appropriate to your aggregation function is a different matter.<br />
MIN is unaffected, but AVG(DISTINCT col) and AVG(col) would return different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
